| |
Fieldbus Tutorial by INTRO2U.COM |
Advantages of
Fieldbus
The fieldbus has a multitude of advantages that the end users will
benefit from. The major advantage of the fieldbus, and the one that is
most attractive to the end user is its reduction in capital costs. The
savings attained by the user stem from three main areas, initial
savings, maintenance savings, and savings due to improved systems
performance.
Initial Savings
One of the main features of the fieldbus is its significant reduction in
wiring. Each process cell requires only one wire to be run to the main
cable, with a varying number of cells available. The cost of installing
field equipment in a fieldbus system is thus significantly reduced.
Installation costs are further reduced due to the fact that the fieldbus
it is a multi-drop rather than point-to-point system and the multidrop
network can offer a 5:1 reduction in field wiring expense.
The price of equipment is reduced significantly in a fieldbus system,
with savings of approximately $50 per field device possible.
The fieldbus system requires less labour to install than conventional
bus systems, and saves money due to a reduction in materials needed for
the installation.
The simpler system design implies that fewer system drawings will be
needed in order to develop a fieldbus system. This also has the
advantage that the simpler design will result in less complex and faster
bus systems.
Maintenance Savings
The fact that the fieldbus system is less complex than conventional bus
systems implies that there will be less overall need for maintenance.
The simplification of systems means that the long term reliability of
the bus system is increased.
With the fieldbus system, it is possible for the operators to easily see
all of the devices included in the system and to also easily interpret
the interaction between the individual devices. This will make
discovering the source of any problems and carrying out maintenance much
simpler, and thus will reduce the overall debugging time.
The debugging and maintenance of the system will also be enhanced due to
the fact that fieldbus enables online diagnostics to be carried out on
individual field devices. The online diagnostics include functions such
as open wire detection and predictive maintenance and simplify tasks
such as device calibration.
Improved Systems Performance
Fieldbus allows the user increased flexibility in the design of the bus
system. Some algorithms and control procedures that with conventional
bus systems must be contained in control programs can now reside in the
individual field devices, reducing the overall size of the main control
system. This reduces the overall systems cost and makes future expansion
a simpler prospect.
System performance is enhanced with the use of fieldbus technology due
to the simplification of the collection of information from field
devices. Measurement and device values will be available to all field
and control devices in engineering units. This eliminates the need to
convert raw data into the required units and will free the control
system for other more important tasks. The reduction in information
complication will allow the development of better and more effective
process control systems.
With fieldbus technology, two-way communication between field devices
and the control system is made possible. System performance is enhanced
due to the ability to communicate directly between two field devices
rather than via the control system. This also enables several related
field devices to be combined into one device.
With fieldbus technology, field instruments can be calibrated,
initialised, operated and repaired faster than most conventional analog
instrumentation. this leads to an overall reduction in time required to
operate the fieldbus system.
Other Advantages
As well as the cost advantages that fieldbus technology embodies, there
are many other miscellaneous advantages that are included in the
fieldbus package.
Although it is a major challenge trying to develop a single worldwide
protocol for process control, there are currently only two real
protocols for fieldbus, being ISP and WorldFIP and while there is still
two protocols rather than a world standard, it is better than a possible
many. Work is being done to merge the two protocols into a standard
which will be a major advantage. The fact that eventually all fieldbus
equipment will be standardised will mean that expansion of a system or
addition of field devices will be extremely simple, requiring no
interfaces or converters.
The fieldbus protocol involves only four layers and a set of management
services. Fieldbus has the advantage that the user should not have to be
concerned with the Data Link layer or the Application layer. As far as
the end user is concerned, they should simply work. The user will only
be required to have a limited knowledge of the management services,
because some of the information generated by them will be needed if a
problem occurs in the system. In fact, it should only be necessary for
the user to concern themselves with the Physical and User layers.
Fieldbus
Organisations
This section establishes who have been the major instigators of fieldbus
development over the past several years. A brief summary of the
developing standard is also covered.
The major players in the fieldbus area were previously dominated by two
major groups:
1. WorldFIP (World Factory Instrumentation Protocol)
2. ISP (Interoperable Systems Project)
However, recently, these two groups have joined together to form the
Fieldbus Foundation (FF). The Fieldbus Foundation and another
organisation known as Profibus-ISP are now competing for market
dominance.
Two standards bodies known as the IEC (International Electrotechnical
Commission) and the ISA (Industry Society of America ) are currently
working on an international standard known as SP50. This standard will
hopefully allow the manufacturers of fieldbus equipment all around the
world to produce compatible instruments for industrial applications.
WorldFIP, ISP and FF have pledged that they will eventually evolve their
products to meet the standard when it arrives. However, when the
standard finally does arrive, users of existing non-conforming equipment
will run the risk of having obsolete equipment or having to purchase new
systems at an excessive cost.
At the time of writing, information regarding actual market share for
the Fieldbus Foundation and Profibus-ISP was not available, but Process
Engineering’s Instrumentation Supplement for 1994, predicts that the
Fieldbus Foundation will take the greater market share.
World Factory Instrumentation Protocol
The World Factory Instrumentation Protocol (WorldFIP) was developed from
an earlier French National Standard known as NFC 46-600, or more
commonly as FIP. It is a consortium of companies producing field bus
instruments that use a messaging system. Time critical options are
supposedly guaranteed in a WorldFIP implementation. WorldFIP plans to
add a device description tool, known as the WorldFIP Device Builder. The
Device Builder will automatically inform the control system what
features and parameters each instrument connected to the bus has.
Interestingly , WorldFIP is divisional in nature with a UK, European and
North American division. Each division is motivated by similar goals and
similar implementations, but each operates almost autonomously from the
others.
Some of the major members of WorldFIP include:
-
Honeywell (Arizona)
-
Bailey Controls (Ohio)
-
Cegelec (Paris)
-
Allen Bradley Corporation (Ohio)
-
Telemecanique (Paris)
-
Ronan Engineering Co. (California)
-
Square D
-
Electricite de France (France)
-
Elf (France)
Interoperable Systems Project The Interoperable Systems Project (ISP) implementation is based on the
German National Standard DIN STD19245, also known as Process Field Bus,
or Profibus. Profibus is similar to the token passing network commonly
implemented on many networks today. The ISP extension to Profibus is the
Device Description Language (DDL). DDL allows an instrument added to the
bus system to communicate to a master control what its functions and
capabilities are.
Some of the major members of ISP include:
-
Siemens (Germany)
-
The Rosemount Group (Minnesota)
-
Fisher Controls, Inc. (Texas)
-
Foxoboro Co. (Massachusetts)
-
ABB Co. (Sweden)
-
Yokogawa Electric Corporation (Tokyo)
Fieldbus Foundation On a positive note ISP and WorldFIP (North American division) have been
working together since late 1993 on a possible merger of their
technology. A single solution has been what industry has needed for a
long time, so in June of 1994, the Fieldbus Foundation (FF) was set up
between ISP and WorldFIP (NA). However, at least 1 to 2 years of delay
is expected before a complete product can be produced.
Profibus-ISP Effectively a breakaway group of the Profibus and ISP organisations,
this group effectively announced to the world that they will have their
own fieldbus communications system ready in approximately June/July
1994. Profibus-ISP is derived from the Profibus and ISP products, and
hence has the features of both with some small additions.
At the time of writing, little information on Profibus-ISP and the
Fieldbus Foundation was available.
IEC/ISA SP50 The ISA/IEC are developing a standard with the working name of SP50. The
standard will follow the ISO/OSI seven layer model for data
communications with an additional eighth layer which focuses on the
product interoperablility.
Current progress on the SP50 is as follows
1. Physical - Completed. Specification includes
-
31.25 kbit/sec, 1 Mbit/sec and 2.5 Mbit/sec data transfer rates.
-
Requirements for fieldbus component parts.
-
Media and network configuration requirements for data integrity and
interoperability between devices.
2. Data Link - Balloting 1995. Draft standard by 1996.
3. Application - Balloting in 1995. 4. User - In Committee now. Balloting late 1995.
5. System & Network Management - expect to be completed mid 1996.
Links
|